Angel Li

Principal
Canberra

Angel is an experienced insurance litigator, specialising in the areas of CTP, public liability, professional indemnity, catastrophic injuries, workers compensation, medical negligence and motor and recovery claims.

Angel’s practice includes representing private insurers in the ACT and NSW, the Commonwealth Government, and the ACT Government. She has significant experience advising insurers in large scale public liability claims involving multiple defendants, issues of indemnity and insurance cover, and complex contribution claims.

With her in-depth knowledge of the NSW CTP Insurance Scheme and the MAI Scheme in the ACT, Angel has achieved successful outcomes for her clients in motor vehicle accident claims.

Angel’s expertise also includes representing clients in coronial investigation and inquests, and a range of health practitioners in disciplinary investigations and proceedings, and in medical malpractice litigation. She is a strategic litigator and achieves excellent and early resolution for her clients through her proactive and collaborative approach.  

Angel has been recognised as a Leading Lawyer in the ACT by Doyle’s Guide in the Compulsory Third Party Insurance category.

RECENT INSIGHTS
Jan 29, 2024

INSIGHT: Case Note | An Interlocutory Odyssey of Non-Compliance – Dankers v Volunteer Maritime Rescue NSW [2023] ACTSC 395

Dankers v Volunteer Maritime Rescue NSW [2023] ACTSC 395 The Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory has dismissed an application from a plaintiff seeking a defence to be struck out and judgment entered for the plaintiff for ‘systematic’ and ‘continuous’ non-compliance with Court orders, while providing a scathing judgment on the non-compliance. Background The […]

Nov 27, 2023

INSIGHT: Case Note | When to Play the Blame Game: Allegations of Contributory Negligence in the ACT – Wilson v Australian Capital Territory [2023] ACTSC 287

Wilson v Australian Capital Territory [2023] ACTSC 287 The Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory has dismissed an application by the plaintiff to strike out aspects of the Territory’s defence, pleading contributory negligence in circumstances where a breach of duty of care had previously been admitted with no reference to contributory negligence during pre-litigation. […]

VIEW MORE