Dankers v Volunteer Maritime Rescue NSW [2023] ACTSC 395 The Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory has dismissed an application from a plaintiff seeking a defence to be struck out and judgment entered for the plaintiff for ‘systematic’ and ‘continuous’ non-compliance with Court orders, while providing a scathing judgment on the non-compliance. Background The […]
FILTER BY
- Abuse
- Community
- Construction
- Financial Services
- AFS licensing, disclosure & exemptions/class orders
- Brokers-Dealers
- Financial Product Distribution & Foreign Financial Services
- Financial Product Innovation & Fintech
- Financial Services Corporate Advisory
- Regulatory Enforcement & Investigations
- Regulatory, Policy, Governance & Compliance
- Superannuation & Funds
- Fitness & Sport
- Government
- Health
- Property
- Resources
- Transport
- Veterinary
Case Note | When to Play the Blame Game: Allegations of Contributory Negligence in the ACT – Wilson v Australian Capital Territory [2023] ACTSC 287
Wilson v Australian Capital Territory [2023] ACTSC 287 The Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory has dismissed an application by the plaintiff to strike out aspects of the Territory’s defence, pleading contributory negligence in circumstances where a breach of duty of care had previously been admitted with no reference to contributory negligence during pre-litigation. […]